An argument for authenticity
By Farieda Nazier
The following entry
is based on my own views of a public talk I recently attended in Joburg. The
main topic of this talk was socio political art and whether it was still
feasible for South African artist to be using the socio political as reference
or content for their work. I argue that South African artists should
remain true to their inspiration i.e. Africa and their Africaness.
“Things got blurry politically after ninety four” was one of the opening comments at the public seminar. In
other words ‘things’ or politics are no longer simple in the times of a
democratic constitution, here in South Africa. Does this mean that
Apartheid, in retrospect, is seen as a very clear, black and white, simple
politics? Could this be owing to its systematic nature which
provided for ease of critique, commentary and protest, from the media and art
world alike?
One view is that many of us are over
saturated with the idea of Apartheid and its consequences (by consequences I mean present day South Africa). Anything referencing the A-word seems to be considered smut. I often
hear the call to “Stop blaming Apartheid” and the famous "Why are we living in the past?"
The fact is that we are all products of
our past. We can all agree that the past is multifaceted and layered with input
from our parents, siblings, the environment, society, media,
politics, you name it. WE are shaped by all these, in various proportions. As
South Africans, one such element which shaped us here and now in the present is
our shared socio-political history. In this instance that specific history is
called Apartheid. Does it make sense to try and forget it, if this is what
constitutes US?
As artists we are inspired by our
perceptions of our surroundings and experiences thereof & with. We filter
these through our senses and deposit it in our minds, assimilate and process
the data; and subsequently deliver visual and sound ‘reports’ which manifest as
artworks. The reality is that the surroundings that we confront on a day to day
basis are heavily laced with physical and intangible remnants of Apartheid.
Poverty is one such remnant. If we are surrounded, affected or disturbed by it,
why not depict it? That said, does it make
sense to search abroad, “in Europe and elsewhere” to make our art more valuable
and saleable? (Let’s not start on the value of art works!) Would we not be
dishonest with ourselves if we do so?
I would like to open up dialogue by arguing 1)
for South African artist to remain true and authentic to their Africa and
Africaness; and 2) against the appropriation of European and ‘other’
ideas.
Please feel free to comment or
critique.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteExcellent and helpful post… I am so glad to left comment on this. This has been a so interesting read, would love to read more here….
ReplyDeleteMosaic shop